fix: add test for file embed and code fragments #2616
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@jacobsorme is attempting to deploy a commit to the Docsify Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
sy-records
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2025
Member
sy-records
left a comment
sy-records
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks!
Looking forward to your next PR. ❤️
15 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Had an idea of adding a full line code fragment keyword (simliar to
/// [demo]). This would be useful in a HTML context, where there will be a trailing-->after a/// [demo]if it's wrapped in a comment. Thought I should add some tests for the current file embed code fragment setup first at least.Related issue, if any:
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
For any code change,
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Tested in the following browsers: